New Consumer Report of Blue Cave, November 2 news, according to foreign news reports, recent research in the United States believes that electronic cigarettes can cause blood pressure and heart function to change, which has caused criticism from British scientists. Scientists believe that current evidence is currently evidence It still shows that electronic cigarettes are safer than smoking.

After reading how the electronic cigarettes lead to changing headlines that cause blood pressure and heart function, 4.3 million people who use electronic cigarettes in the UK are confused.

After the US research team suggested to measure heart rate and blood pressure more doubts about smoking than electronic cigarettes, senior British scholars expressed frustration.

Scientists at King London have recently conducted the largest censorship of electronic cigarettes, and they are desperate for reports of American analysis.

The American team compared the cardiovascular function of electronic cigarettes, smokers, and the cardiovascular function of no nicotine, and said that they found that after the electronic cigarette and traditional cigarettes, the participants had a significant negative impact on health.

The heart rate and blood pressure of electronic cigarettes or smoking have increased significantly, while those who report not to use nicotine have not seen any changes. People who often use nicotine in heart rate variability and the measurement results of the brachial artery (the main blood vessels supplying blood from the arms and hands) are also worse.

Matthew Tattersall, the main research author of the University of Wisconsin, said: These discoveries show that the risk factors of cardiovascular disease will be more serious after electronic cigarettes or smoking.

The participants also received exercise pressure testing 90 minutes later. Those who smoke or suck electronic cigarettes are significantly poor on all indicators, including the speed of heart rate recovery after exercise and the intensity of the heart at the peak level.

The research team stated that these analysis will be published at the Scientific Conference of the American Heart Association this week, and it has questioned the assumption of more secure e -cigarettes than smoking. However, British scientists have a criticism of how this study is introduced during abstraction.

Professor Peter Hayek at the Institute of Population Health of Queen Mary University of London said American researchers have been irresponsible.

He said: Just like many previous reports, the heart rate part just noticed a well -known short -term effect of nicotine, which is accompanied by all types of stimuli. Watching thrillers or football games or taking the exam will also have the same effect. Drinking a cup of coffee actually produces a longer duration and longer response.

"The main heart health risk of smoking is not caused by nicotine, but caused by other chemicals that do not exist in electronic smoke steam in tobacco smoke. The prejudice for this discovery is irresponsible because it will cause smoking to smoke The person turns to a safer alternative. "

"Electronic cigarette users are usually pre -smokers. Other differences between smokers (including the differences in the level of exercise) are not controlled."

Alan Boobis, an honorary professor of toxicology at the Empire Institute of Technology and Chairman of the British toxicity Commission, said: Considering all the potential impacts on health, I think that there is no content in these abstracts that can challenge the current widely accepted views, that is, electronic cigarette hazards are less than smoking. However, these abstracts do provide further evidence to prove that non -smokers use electronic cigarettes without 100% security.

The research team of King London found that although electronic smoke is not without risks, especially for people who have never smoked, it only constitutes a small part of the health risks of smoking in the short period of time.

Their report reviews many aspects of electronic cigarettes, including who is using electronic cigarettes and what products to use, the impact on health (absolute value and smoking) and the public's views on harm.

The author checked the research on exposed biomarkers -the level of potential harmful substances in the body, as well as the potential harm of biomarkers -measuring biological changes in the body -due to electronic cigarettes or smoking.

The most powerful evidence comes from exposed biomarkers. The level of nitrosamine unique to tobacco (a harmful carcinogenic chemical found in tobacco and tobacco smoke), volatile organic compounds, and other major diseases related to smoking are significantly reduced. Among the e -cigarette users, Nicotine's overall level is lower than or similar to smokers.

Dr. Debie Robson, a senior lecturer who reduces the hazard of tobacco and the author of the report, said: Compared with the smoker, the person who sucks the electronic cigarette is much lower in contact with the level of cancer and other toxic substances. If the government wants to achieve smokeless in England in 2030, it should be considered a priority to help people turn from smoking to electronic cigarettes.

Although the investigators are clearly the benefits of sucking electronic cigarettes compared with smoking, they find that the public's views are backward.

By 2021, only 34% of the smokers accurately believed that the harm of electronic smoking was less than smoking, and only 11% of adult smokers knew that nicotine was not the main reason for the health risks related to smoking. The headline news behind the analysis of the United States does not help change these views.

In response to criticism, Dr. Tat Sol said: We have studied the acute impact of electronic cigarettes on cardiovascular and autonomic nerves. This study did not study the use of ENDS to quit smoking, nor is it to determine which nicotine consumption method is more risky.

"Our data emphasizes that the use of electronic cigarettes has acute impacts on cardiovascular and autonomous nerves, and the use of electronic cigarettes is not benign. Although I appreciate the improvisation of horror movies, there is no contemporary contemporary contemporary hypervochemical substance Long -term research of electronic cigarette safety. "

"The impact of frequent and reusable use of electronic cigarettes on long -term cardiovascular health is unclear. We agree that Nicotine is not a poison in our work. In fact, the change we observe has nothing to do with the improvement of nicotine or the use of products after product use. We encourage it. Dr. Hajek and others read our entire papers, instead of judging the abstracts or some new versions. "

Overwhelming evidence shows that electronic cigarettes are much safer than tobacco. NHS said that although they are not completely risky, electronic cigarettes have a small part of cigarette risk because they do not produce caramel or carbon monoxide.

All of this occurs on the first anniversary of the guidelines for drugs and health product supervision agencies (MHRA), which means that electronic cigarette manufacturers can submit their products to obtain the same regulatory approval as all NHS drugs.

Therefore, the United Kingdom may soon become the world's first country to use electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation tool.

If the product is approved by the MHRA and National Health and Nursing Institute -launched on NHS -clinicians can decide whether to open electronic cigarette patients to NHS according to specific circumstances.

There are currently no electronic cigarettes to be authorized as a pharmaceutical product, but officials said that they will continue to support the company to encourage electronic cigarette products as a drug to obtain a drug to support patient -centric care and acquisition.