New Consumer Report of Blue Cave, November 2 news, recently published articles, including "Nature" (natural magazine). It is believed that for patients with periodontal health, electronic cigarettes may be a safer niche Alternatives can reduce the risk of cavity cancer. Research published in "IGPH" (International Public Health Magazine) shows that compared with cigarettes, electronic cigarettes have no obvious impact on lung health in the short term and will not damage lung function.

With the increasing number of electronic cigarette users, the research on the impact of electronic cigarettes on human health has become more and more deeper. "Nature" magazine disclosed a recent comment article, which pointed out that electronic cigarettes may be the safer sources of nicotine for patients in terms of periodontal health.

This comment was jointly published by the Royal Corwall Hospital and the University of Qatar University. The 279 research reports screened from the Mate analysis method were compared and compared to 170 non -smokers, 176 smokers and 166 electronics. Smoke users. The analysis results show that compared with non -smoking and electronic cigarette users, the periodontal PD (detection depth) and PI (plaques index) of the smokers are significantly worse. Therefore, for those with hidden dangers of periodontal health, using electronic cigarettes to replace traditional cigarettes will be safer.

A Philippine dental expert also urged smokers to switch to electronic cigarettes or HTP products because they can minimize the risk of local cancer. The suggestion of using electronic cigarettes to improve oral health has been confirmed by relevant data. In 2017, a study published in the NCBI (National Biotechnology Information Center) showed that after repeated comparison of the oral health status of 110 users who had just switched to electronic cigarettes, it was found that the participants of the two groups were in. After the study was over, 92%and 98%of people did not experience gum bleeding anymore. This shows that it has greatly improved their oral health after turning to more secure nicotine substitutes such as electronic cigarettes.

Another article published in "IGPH" (international public health magazine) shows that compared with non -electronic cigarettes, the impact of short -term use of electronic cigarettes on lung function is not significant. Researchers adopt system review and META analysis method to analyze keyword retrieval from four databases, web of Science, Embase, and COCHRANE). After rigorous screening, data extraction, literature quality assessment, and statistical analysis, the final evaluation results show that the impact on lung function after short -term use of electronic cigarettes is not obvious compared with cigarette users.

After using electronic cigarettes for 1 month and 3 months, FEVC (force lung volume), FEV1 (one -second breathing volume), PEF (maximum breathing) and other indicators have not changed significantly

Researchers have also found that after the use of electronic cigarettes, there is no difference in the effects of lung ventilation, lung diffusion ability and flow resistance. Although the electronic cigarettes can be effectively quit smoking, the lung function may even be used after using the electronic smoke. Improved. The results of the study are consistent with the results of a long -term study. The study showed that the lung function of the lungs after using electronic cigarettes did not deteriorate. In contrast, the impact of long -term use of electronic cigarettes on lung function is worth deeper clinical observation. Researchers said that this requires additional vertical research for evaluation.